This is a standard position in black feminism, and one accepted by progressive white feminists. In 2016 she wrote, “I’m worried that the project of feminism as a whole is being undermined by the casual derision with which it’s now possible to dismiss white feminism.” I responded in a reasoned piece in the Daily Vox showing that white feminism has a long history of colluding with racism and that forms of white feminism that deny the intersection of race, patriarchy, capitalism and imperialism are complicit with racism. People who had read New Frame, or know Pithouse, were deeply shocked and offended by the piece, which also had strongly Sinophobic elements and traded in a classic anti-Indian colonial stereotype.ĭavis has a history with me. This started after Rebecca Davis published a piece about New Frame and Pithouse in the Daily Maverick. It should go without saying that we are both autonomous people, each with our own jobs, intellectual orientations and forms of political commitment. The editor of New Frame, Richard Pithouse, is my former husband, and I have been placed in the role of a classic sexist stereotype - the Lady Macbeth figure. Yet somehow my name keeps coming up as this liberal attack unfolds. On one of the very few occasions that I visited the office I was treated with wounding hostility by three white staff members after which I preferred to not even visit the offices. It has been bizarre because I never had any kind of formal or informal role in New Frame. When the attacks on New Frame in the liberal media began after the funding crisis, I bizarrely found myself rendered hyper-visible. The same is true of sexism, something that is compounded in the case of black women. The philosopher Lewis Gordan shows that anti-black racism takes the form of an oscillation between the invisibility and hyper-visibility of black people.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |